Re P (Child: Financial Provision)
[2003] EWCA Civ 837. The second point concerns the making of capital awards for children, whether in Schedule 1 cases or cases pursuant to the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. There have been numerous cases, starting with
Lilford (Lord) v Glynn
and continuing with the recent case of
Ilott v The Blue Cross and others
as referred to above, which have disapproved of such awards. In
- MR JUSTICE MOOR:-
- The relevant history, including the litigation history
- Sears Tooth
- Evidence filed in support of the respective cases
- The respective Open Proposals
- The parties’ Case Summaries
- Ilott v The Blue Cross and others
- Lilford (Lord) v Glynn
- Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989
- Haroutunian v Jennings
- Re P (Child: Financial Provision)
- Ilott
- DN v UD
- Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984
- Agbaje
- More general matters of law
- Moher v Moher
- Baker v Baker
- Prest v Petrodel
- Duxbury
- The evidence of HRH Princess Haya
- The evidence of Director 1
- My conclusions on the issues of principle
- Quantum
- Al-Khatib v Masry
- The security budget
- General maintenance
- The costs of security for the children as adults and the level of security
- Schedule A
- HRH’s home near Kensington Palace
- Castlewood
- Leisure