White v White
[2000] UKHL 54; [2001] 1 AC 596 that there is to be no discrimination in financial remedy cases between a husband and wife. This was expanded upon in
- JUDGMENT
- The relevant history
- The statements and expert reports
- The assets
- The Open Offers
- Wells
- The Law
- White v White
- K v L
- Miller/McFarlane
- Radmacher
- Kremen v Agrest
- Versteegh v Versteegh
- Z v Z (No 2)
- Brack v Brack
- Brack
- SJ v RA
- Duxbury
- The evidence I heard
- My findings as to the Marriage Contract
- The quantification of the assets
- £ 3,284,021
- The Wife’s needs
- £1,395,541
- Cross-check
- Ms D
- Child periodical payments
- CB v KB
- Conclusion