[2022] EWFC 130
that the Court must: “bear in mind the rubric that today’s medical certainty may be discarded by the next generation of experts together with the hypothesis that causation must not be dismissed just because it is unusual. The Court must always exercise considerable caution when considering the significance of expert opinions, particularly where a condition or combination of conditions is unusual. Unusual, rare or unknown conditions do exist and it is sometimes not possible to identify what is not known or understood; what has been described in many cases as a known unknown.”21.Additionally, in looking at the wider canvas I am invited to consider the relevance of the judgment in
- MR RECORDER BICKLER KC
- Applicant
- Respondents
- Judgement of Recorder Bickler KC
- April
- The Law
- Central Bedfordshire Council v. F, D and C
- [2015] EWFC 26
- [2022] EWFC 130
- [2013] EWHC 968
- Clinical Geneticists
- The Mother and the Father
- The Positions of the Parties at the Conclusion of the Evidence
- Decision
