Sheikh Mohammed v Princess Haya [2021] EWHC 3480 (Fam)
. 8.On the 27th September 2021, F made an application, framed as a Specific Issue Order, seeking that any statement or admission made by him in the proceedings, would not be disclosed to the police. That application was pursued on his behalf by leading Counsel on the 17th November 2021. I refused the application for the reasons set out in my judgment:
- Approved Judgment
- MR JUSTICE HAYDEN:
- F v M [2021] EWFC 4
- H-N and others (Children) (Domestic Abuse: Finding of Fact Hearings) (Rev 2) [2021] EWCA Civ 448
- Section 2(1) Children Act 1989
- “Acquisition of parental responsibility by father.
- were not
- Re A and B (Children: Restrictions on Parental Responsibility: Radicalisation and Extremism) [2016] 2 FLR 977
- MZ v FZ and others [2022] All ER (D) 130.
- Sheikh Mohammed v Princess Haya [2021] EWHC 3480 (Fam)
- F v M [2021] EWHC 3133
- “Child arrangements (spends time with) order (Children Act 1989, section 8)
- Prohibited steps order (Children Act 1989, section 8)
- Further applications (Children Act 1989, section 91(14))
- Non-molestation order (Family Law Act 1996, section 42)
- Order for disclosure (Family Procedure Rules 2010, rule 12.73(1)(b)
- Re A (A Child) (Supervised Contact) (Section 91(14) Children Act 1989 Orders) [2021] EWCA Civ 1749
- Section 91(14) orders: further provision