Re BS (Children) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146
, and surrounding case law. I bear in mind that the child’s interests are paramount, and that they will ordinarily include being brought up by the child’s natural family unless the overriding requirement of the child’s welfare makes that not possible. Also that I must consider all reasonable options before coming to a decision, and then that in considering all the options I must take into account the assistance and support that the local authority could offer. 78.I bear in mind also the clear need for the least interventionist approach, and, as set out within
- Introduction:
- Parties and their positions
- History:
- Threshold
- Evidence:
- The mother’s response to the finding of fact judgment.
- The mother’s overall ability to meet the needs of H and Y.
- H and Y’s Health needs.
- Assistance offered to the mother in relation to her parenting.
- The mother’s ability to understand risk, and protect the children.
- Mothers’ mental health and the impact of that on her ability to care for the children.
- Positives of the mother’s care of both children:
- The Legal principles.
- [2008] UKHL 3 [2009] AC 11
- Re BS (Children) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146
- Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings Threshold Criteria) [2013] UKSC 33
- s1 (3) of the Children Act 1989
- Options available to the court;
- the ascertainable wishes and feelings of the children concerned (considered in the light of their age and understanding);
- their physical, emotional and educational needs
- the likely effect on them of any change in his circumstances
- age, sex, background and any characteristics of theirs which the court considers relevant
- any harm which they have suffered or are at risk of suffering
- How capable each of his parents, and any other person in relation to whom the court considers the question to be relevant, is of meeting his needs;
- the range of powers available to the court under this Act in the proceedings in question.
- Conclusion: