Postscript
81.After this judgment was handed down, I heard argument on costs. I gave an extempore judgment. I accepted that this was a case where the presumption of no order as to costs applied, but I took the view that the Wife had succeeded entirely in her case at trial, justifying a costs order in her favour. I took into consideration a number of countervailing factors, including that significant costs would have been incurred in preparing the case to a point where it could be settled. In this particular case, I accepted that it was extremely difficult to settle the litigation until after the business had been sold. I decided that an appropriate contribution for the Husband to make towards the Wife’s costs was £250,000. Mr Justice Moor3 April 2023
- JUDGMENT
- The relevant history
- The breakdown of the marriage
- The relevant litigation
- Open Proposals
- Section 25 statement
- Supporting witness statements
- The schedule of assets
- The parties’ respective Position Statements
- The law I have to apply
- White v White
- K v L
- Miller/McFarlane
- Work v Gray
- XW v XH
- JL v SL (No 2)
- SK v WL
- Cowan v Cowan
- Evans v Evans
- S v S
- CO v YZ
- Wyatt v Vince
- Cooper-Hohn v Hohn
- Lucas
- British Railways Board v Herrington
- The evidence that I heard
- My conclusions – special contribution
- My conclusions – post-separation endeavour
- Postscript
