The Rules
The Rules
Under Rule 2 of the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (as amended) (“theRules”):
Overriding objective and parties’ obligation to co-operate with the Tribunal
The overriding objective of these Rules is to enable the Tribunal to deal with cases fairly and justly.
Dealing with a case fairly and justly includes—
dealing with the case in ways which are proportionate to the importance of the case, the complexity of the issues, the anticipated costs and the resources of the parties;
avoiding unnecessary formality and seeking flexibility in the proceedings;
ensuring, so far as practicable, that the parties are able to participate fully in the proceedings;
using any special expertise of the Tribunal effectively; and
avoiding delay, so far as compatible with proper consideration of the issues.
The Tribunal must seek to give effect to the overriding objective when it—
exercises any power under these Rules; or
interprets any rule or practice direction.
Parties must—
help the Tribunal to further the overriding objective; and
co-operate with the Tribunal generally.
Under Rule 20, proceedings must be started by sending a notice of appeal to the tribunal and under Rule 20(3) “The appellant must provide with a notice of appeal a copy of any written record of any decision appealed against, and any statement of reasons for that decision, that the appellant has or can reasonably obtain”.
Furthermore, under Rule 20(4), if a notice of appeal is provided after the 30 day time limit, but the relevant legislation provides that an appeal may be made or notified after that time with the permission of the tribunal, then the notice of appeal must include a request for such permission and the reason why the notice of appeal was not provided in time.
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- THE LAW
- Right of appeal
- The Rules
- Case law
- EVIDENCE AND FACTS
- The consequence of using a duty override code was that no customs duty was paid on the imported steel
- He followed up that letter by issuing the decision letter which confirmed his original view, on 7 November 2023
- The appellant requested a statutory review of the decision and in the review conclusion letter dated 20 December 2023 (“ the review conclusion letter ”) the reviewing officer upheld the decision
- That letter from the tribunal also explained that the appellant should rectify the error before resubmitting the notice of appeal, and that if this meant that the notice of appeal was submitted outsid
- DISCUSSION
- No weight should be attached to the fact that the appellant is a litigant in person
- Our view
- Conclusions
![TC09514 - [2025] UKFTT 00524 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)