Heading

Case Number: TC09530
Taylor House
Appeal reference: TC/2024/02905; TC/2024/02906; TC/2024/02907
CAPITAL GAINS TAX – entrepreneurs’ relief – disposals of shares in a company holding property and seeking planning permission for the re–development of that property into residential and commercial spaces – whether, throughout the period of one year before the disposals, the company in question was a “trading company”, which is to say a company carrying on trading activities whose activities did not include to a substantial extent activities other than trading activities – held that, in taking steps to obtain planning permission, the company was carrying on activities for the purposes of a trade that it was preparing to carry on or with a view to starting a trade and that it was therefore carrying on “trading activities”, as defined, but that its substantial non–trading assets, the fact that its only income was investment income and the fact that a meaningful part of the re–developed property would include commercial space to be let out for investment income meant that its activities included to a substantial extent activities other than trading activities – accordingly, the company was not a “trading company” throughout the relevant period and entrepreneurs’ relief was not available for the disposals – appeals dismissed
Heard on: 6 May, 2025
Judgment date: 22 May 2025
Before
TRIBUNAL JUDGE TONY BEARE
MR DUNCAN MCBRIDE
Between
MRS TAMZIN EYRE
MRS ZAYNE MACLEOD
MR CONRAD PHOENIX
Appellants
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
Respondents
Representation:
For the Appellant: Ms Rebecca Sheldon, of counsel, instructed by Tax Innovations Limited
For the Respondents: Ms Gemma Truelove, litigator of HM Revenue and Customs’ Solicitor’s Office
DECISION
- Heading
- Introduction
- the facts
- The relevant law
- with a view to its … starting to carry on a trade, …” The issue in dispute
- Not carrying out trading activities
- Our conclusion
- Activities not for the purposes of a trade which the company was preparing to carry on or with a view to its starting to carry on a trade
- Our conclusion
- Post–script
- Substantial non–trading activities
- The parties’ submissions
- and that no re–development of the Property has ever taken place
- Conclusions
![TC09530 - [2025] UKFTT 00566 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)