Our conclusion
Our conclusion
We agree with the Respondents that the company was not actually carrying on a trade during the relevant period, for the reasons given in paragraphs 25 above. Indeed, we did not understand the Appellants to disagree with that proposition.
However, that does not mean that the activities of the company during the relevant period were not for the purposes of a trade that it was preparing to carry on or with a view to its starting to carry on a trade.
- Heading
- Introduction
- the facts
- The relevant law
- with a view to its … starting to carry on a trade, …” The issue in dispute
- Not carrying out trading activities
- Our conclusion
- Activities not for the purposes of a trade which the company was preparing to carry on or with a view to its starting to carry on a trade
- Our conclusion
- Post–script
- Substantial non–trading activities
- The parties’ submissions
- and that no re–development of the Property has ever taken place
- Conclusions
![TC09530 - [2025] UKFTT 00566 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)