Drafting error
Drafting error
In Inco Europe Lord Nicholls acknowledged that it was possible to read words into legislation to correct obvious drafting errors. Given the interpretive role of courts/tribunals, before doing so the Tribunal must be abundantly sure of: (1) the intended purpose of the statute or provision in question; (2) that by inadvertence the draftsman and Parliament failed to give effect to that purpose in the provision in question; and (3) the substance of the provision Parliament would have made, although not necessarily the precise words Parliament would have used, had the error in the Bill been noticed.
I now consider these factors in turn.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Legislative Framework
- EU VAT Legislation
- Welsh devolution and the regulation of social care in Wales
- Parties’ Arguments
- HMRC’s case
- Drafting error
- Updating construction
- Conforming interpretation
- Cascade’s response
- Conforming interpretation
- Discussion
- Drafting error
- Intended purpose of the statute
- Inadvertence
- The provision that Parliament would have made
- Conclusion
- Updating construction
- Conforming interpretation
- Alleged breach of EU law
- Is a conforming interpretation possible?
- Conclusions
![TC09680 - [2025] UKFTT 01332 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)