Other prejudice to Mr Di Lellio
Other prejudice to Mr Di Lellio
If Mr Di Lellio fails to obtain permission to appeal, the HMRC decisions he is now seeking to challenge will become final and the bankruptcy proceedings will recommence. We did not have an up to date figure for the amount in issue, but the bankruptcy petition filed in 2023 gives a figure of £139,029.70.
However, not all of the amounts sought by HMRC relate to Mr Di Lellio’s rental income. Officer Fowler also amended his SA returns for 2012-13 to 2015-16 for other matters, see §20, and the statutory demand also included tax for later years (2017-18 through to 2021-22); two penalties under FA 2008, Sch 36 for failing to provide information; late payment penalties from 2014-15 through to 2020-21 and significant sums by way of interest on these other debts. It follows that even if Mr Di Lellio were to receive permission to make late appeals, he would still owe HMRC a substantial amount of money.
In addition, having to pay HMRC the sums for which permission to appeal has been sought in the Application is the inevitable consequence of failing to gain permission to appeal. We therefore give little weight to this factor.
- Heading
- Introduction and Summary
- The Evidence
- Findings of fact
- Tax years 2011-12 and 2012-13: assessments
- Tax years 2013-14 to 2015-16: assessments
- The Form
- Mr Di Lellio’s diagnosis
- Penalties for inaccuracies
- PLNs
- Subsequent events including bankruptcy proceedings
- Jurisdiction of the Tribunal
- The legislation about appeals
- The discovery assessments
- The closure notice amendments
- The steps taken by the parties
- The timing of the Application
- The Case Law
- The first Martland stage: the delays
- The second Marland stage: reasons for delays
- Reliance on advisers
- The need for time limits to be respected
- Merits
- Other prejudice to Mr Di Lellio
- Prejudice to HMRC
- Other Tribunal users
- Conclusions
![TC09630 - [2025] UKFTT 01071 (TC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_7HSuEAV.png)