Section 10(2) TMA
43.Section 10(2) of the 1994 Act provides: “A person infringes a registered trade mark if he uses in the course of trade a sign where because – (a)the sign is identical with the trade mark and is used in relation to goods or services similar to those for which the trade mark is registered, or (b)the sign is similar to the trade mark and is used in relation to goods or services similar to those for which the trade mark is registered,there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, which includes the likelihood of association with the trade mark.”
Use of a sign in the course of trade
44.Use of a sign is defined in section 10(4) TMA and includes offering or exposing goods for sale, putting them on the market or stocking them for those purposes under the sign (10(4)(b) TMA). 45.Any use of a sign in the context of commercial activity with a view to economic advantage and not as a private matter, no matter how modest, will be sufficient to satisfy the requirement for ‘use in the course of trade’ (per
- Sitting as a deputy Judge of the High Court
- Defendant
- INTRODUCTION
- Trade Mark
- CHRONOLOGY
- ISSUES
- title
- Section 10(2) TMA
- C-206/01 Arsenal Football Club plc v Matthew Reed
- Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd
- Specsavers
- Maier
- Canon
- Interflora v Marks & Spencer
- Specsaver
- Section 10(3) TMA
- C-375/97 General Motors v Yplon
- link
- Intel Corporation Inc v CPM United Kingdom Ltd
- Red Bull GmbH v Sun Mark Limited and Sea Air & Land Forwarding Limited
- Intel Corporation
- Passing Off
- Reckitt & Colman Product v Borden
- [2013] FSR 21
- The National Guild of Removers and Storers Limited v Bee Moved Limited, Nicholas Anthony Burns and Oliver Christopher Robert Sampson
- Ewing v Buttercup Margarine Co
- Advocaat
- ANALYSIS OF ISSUES
- Average Consumer
- Use of the sign complained of
- Sign identical or similar to the Trade Mark
- LTJ Diffusion
- Jack Wills
- Stannard v Reay
- Sutherland v V2 Music Ltd
- QUANTUM OF DAMAGES
- SUMMARY
