SUMMARY
112.To summarise:i)I am satisfied that the use by the Defendant of the Listings to sell the Product after 18 February 2013 infringed the Trade Mark pursuant to section 10(2) TMA;ii)I cannot be satisfied that the Trade Mark has a reputation amongst a significant part of the relevant public and so the claim for infringement under section 10(3) TMA fails;iii)I am satisfied that the use by the Defendant of the Listings to sell the Product before 18 February 2013 was passing off;iv)The Claimants are entitled to an injunction restraining the Defendant from further infringement and passing off;v)The Defendant shall pay the Claimants the sum of £25,359.75 in damages for such infringement and passing off.113.I will hear submissions on interest, costs, and consequential orders at the handing down of this judgment.
- Sitting as a deputy Judge of the High Court
- Defendant
- INTRODUCTION
- Trade Mark
- CHRONOLOGY
- ISSUES
- title
- Section 10(2) TMA
- C-206/01 Arsenal Football Club plc v Matthew Reed
- Specsavers International Healthcare Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd
- Specsavers
- Maier
- Canon
- Interflora v Marks & Spencer
- Specsaver
- Section 10(3) TMA
- C-375/97 General Motors v Yplon
- link
- Intel Corporation Inc v CPM United Kingdom Ltd
- Red Bull GmbH v Sun Mark Limited and Sea Air & Land Forwarding Limited
- Intel Corporation
- Passing Off
- Reckitt & Colman Product v Borden
- [2013] FSR 21
- The National Guild of Removers and Storers Limited v Bee Moved Limited, Nicholas Anthony Burns and Oliver Christopher Robert Sampson
- Ewing v Buttercup Margarine Co
- Advocaat
- ANALYSIS OF ISSUES
- Average Consumer
- Use of the sign complained of
- Sign identical or similar to the Trade Mark
- LTJ Diffusion
- Jack Wills
- Stannard v Reay
- Sutherland v V2 Music Ltd
- QUANTUM OF DAMAGES
- SUMMARY
