Claim No: IP-2022-000053 - [2025] EWHC 1827 (IPEC)
Fecha: 24-Jul-2025
Joint tortfeasorship for copyright infringement – pre-notification
Joint tortfeasorship for copyright infringement – pre-notification
The Claimants’ opening written submissions set out their pre-notification position in relation to copyright as follows (with my comments interpolated):
GM Drinks was said to be liable as a primary tortfeasor under section 18 of the CDPA – I have found that allegation made out in relation to the First Label only.
Thus, I need to assess joint tortfeasorship by BSH and Mr Patch in relation to GM Drinks’ liability under section 18 of the CDPA in relation to the First Label. This might be described as strict liability copyright infringement – even though GM Drinks did not know it was doing anything unlawful, it was. However, there was no evidence at all that BSH or Mr Patch knew of Ms Martin’s Work prior to 13 April 2020, and Mr Patch gave evidence that he did not know of her Work prior to that date. In my judgment, the allegation of secondary liability in relation to pre-notification copyright infringement fails.
- Heading
- David Stone (sitting as Deputy High Court Judge)
- Section 2
- Procedural Matters
- Confidentiality
- Pleading Points
- List of Issues
- Witnesses
- Examples of the Allegedly Infringing Products
- Background Facts
- Mr Patch’s Position
- Copyright Subsistence
- The Law
- The First Label
- The Second Label
- Section 16
- Section 17
- The Third Label
- Acts of Infringement
- Conclusions on Copyright Infringement
- Moral Rights Infringement
- Passing Off
- The law
- Goodwill
- Misrepresentation
- Damage
- Knowledge and Correspondence
- Joint Tortfeasorship
- Joint tortfeasorship for copyright infringement – pre-notification
- Joint tortfeasorship for copyright infringement – post-notification
- Joint tortfeasorship for passing off – pre-notification
- Joint tortfeasorship for passing off – post-notification
- Flagrancy
- Summary
- Next steps