Juristeca
Juristeca País
    [2025] EWHC 2684 (KB)
    King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court

    [2025] EWHC 2684 (KB)

    Fecha: 17-Oct-2025

    Error al cargar el documento

    Vista, DOCUMENTO COMPLETO
    • Heading
    • Evidence 14 - 16
    • Defendant’s witnesses 124 - 169
    • Law 201 - 203
    • Analysis 215 - 216
    • Introduction
    • Facts; an overview
    • The Parties’ Cases
    • PARTICULARS OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
    • PARTICULARS OF MISFEASANCE IN PUBLIC OFFICE
    • Evidence
    • Defendant’s witnesses
    • Mr Deveney’s disclosure and associated evidence
    • Lisa Vescio and Paul Vincent
    • Case Summary and MG6
    • To summarise At this juncture in the inquiry it is evident that
    • MG6
    • The drugs investigation
    • Claimants witnesses
    • Mr Breeze
    • Mr Wilson
    • However he also explained that
    • The following points are noteworthy
    • Mr Ward
    • Mr Chancellor
    • He continued
    • Anthony Bull
    • Mr Drewery
    • Charles Bott KC
    • Margaretha Gaisford
    • Mr Cooper
    • There was then a diversion into small talk and it was later stated by DS Brownsell that
    • City Club Evidence
    • Victor Miller
    • Mr Pointer
    • The restraint proceedings and the evidence of Mrs Breeze and DC Wilcox
    • Other witnesses
    • David Prior
    • David Graham
    • Mr Graham continued
    • Susan Smith
    • Raymond Adcock
    • Sandra Grunwald
    • James Braithwaite
    • Richard Innes
    • Sir Norman Lamb
    • Corinne Scicluna
    • Dr John Olive
    • Defendant’s witnesses
    • Closed mind
    • Conduct of officers
    • Pressure to achieve a result
    • Health Care Commission
    • Mr Cooper
    • Ms Gaisford
    • Deveney’s computer
    • 14 th November 2006
    • Linda Todd
    • Mr Prior
    • Dr Barker
    • Missing Rough Book
    • Dr Badcock
    • Charges levied
    • Kelling Park
    • PwC
    • Questionnaire
    • Mr Bull
    • Mr Drewery
    • Exclusion from court
    • Mr Breeze’s interviews
    • Weight attached to other evidence
    • DLA Piper letter
    • Mr Ward
    • DS Brownsell’s mindset
    • Pleaded case
    • DC Baker
    • SIOs
    • Mr Cooper
    • 14 th November, Ms Gaisford and arrests
    • City Club
    • Mr Bull
    • Mr Chancellor
    • Mr Ward
    • DC Deacon
    • DC Wilcox
    • DC Flynn
    • Willan and Woodhead
    • Mr Bull
    • Mr Ward
    • Judith Cass
    • Draft, unsigned statement of Mr Tarrant
    • Other Statements/Interviews
    • Dr Barker
    • And
    • Linda Todd
    • And in respect of the meeting to agree terms
    • Documentary Evidence
    • The Hird Report
    • The trial and the failure of the prosecution
    • After Mr Brook gave evidence Counsel took stock. As they stated
    • Post Prosecution
    • IPCC
    • Reasonable and probable cause
    • Honest belief
    • Objective analysis
    • Malice
    • Misfeasance in public office
    • Conduct in the exercise of public power
    • Acting dishonestly/in bad faith
    • Limitation for misfeasance in Public office
    • Analysis
    • The investigation and prosecution; a critique
    • Interviews
    • Witness tampering
    • The honest belief of officers
    • Other pleaded issues
    • PwC
    • Healthcare Commission
    • Was the case summary deliberately “slanted”
    • Was there reasonable and probable cause?
    • Malice
    • The prosecutor?
    • Conclusion
    • and
    • Sept – Oct ’03 Cawston Park site purchased
    • 25 May ’05 Management buy-out of Chancellor Care Ltd
    • 15 Aug ’05 Mr Cooper commenced employment at Cawston Park as Operations Manager
    • Dec 2005 (per Particulars of Claim)
    • 27 Jan ’06 Allegation made by Mr Deveney to NHS CFS
    • 4 July ’06 Report prepared by DS Kirkham re Operation Genus addressed to Det Supt Julian Blazeby
    • 1 Aug ’06 Meeting between NHS CFS and the Major Investigation team
    • 19 Sept ’06 Unannounced inspection of Cawston Park by HCC
    • 29 March ’07 Statement signed by Mr Brook
    • 23 Aug ’10 Outcome of Operation Meridian Review communicated to Claimants
    • Letter of Response
    • Amended Reply to Defence
    • Conclusions

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca