[2025] EWHC 2684 (KB)

DC Baker said that it was odd but he had no recollection of going to see Mr Bull.

He denied that there was a “disproportionate interest” in anything that Mr Bull said which could give “a negative slant” to Mr Breeze and Mr Wilson”. He said that DC Flynn wrote the statement and there were no deliberate omissions (such as Ian Scott saying that they could charge more) and he believed the statement was a fairly good reflection of the interview. He did not accept that there was anything wrong with the statement.

DC Baker was challenged about the very limited reference to Mr Bull in the summary but pointed out that he did not have any part in the preparation of the summary and had not read it. In his witness statement he set out that;

“On 29th and 30th of August I made notes regarding specific exhibit movements for the draft MG5. I was not responsible for drafting the MG5 but the whole team did provide some input by way of collective views it's a fairly early stage.”