QB-2022-000824 - [2025] EWHC 1610 (KB)
King's / Queen's Bench Division of the High Court

QB-2022-000824 - [2025] EWHC 1610 (KB)

Fecha: 26-Jun-2025

Past Therapies

Past Therapies

49.

The Claimant seeks £1,418.21. These relate to:

i)

yoga sessions in 2019 and 2020. The Claimant says these helped her become more flexible, less inflamed and calmer;

ii)

acupuncture session in 2019, to help with management of her ongoing symptoms and anxiety;

iii)

abdominal massage to help with management of her ongoing symptoms of abdominal pain.

50.

As noted, none are recommended by the experts. There is no evidence that the yoga assisted with inflammation, or that the acupuncture or abdominal massage assisted with her symptoms, although I accept that the Claimant believes the massage did. She said that the acupuncture made her feel worse. The Second Defendant submits that yoga is a commonly undertaken exercise to maintain general fitness and wellbeing and notes that the acupuncture does not appear to help, but offers £130 plus interest for the abdominal massage, accepting it was reasonable for her to trial this alternative therapy. I am afraid I do not adopt that admission. The First Defendant denies this head on the basis of lack of clinical benefit and lack of recommendation by treating clinicians or the experts. I am with the First Defendant. I make no award under this head.