CONCLUSIONS - THE SPLIT TRIAL APPLICATION
CONCLUSIONS - THE SPLIT TRIAL APPLICATION
As I have explained when setting out the legal framework, the question for me is whether there is "real and substantial advantage" of directing that quantum be dealt with separately in the Libel Claim.
I do not accept that it is premature to decide the question at this stage. The nature of the special damages claim is apparent from the pleadings.
I have considered the issue by reference to the eight factors identified in Electrical Water Recycling, and I will explain my reasoning by reference to those factors.
First of all, to summarise my conclusion, I have decided that there is a clear benefit to the special damages claim being heard subsequently, if the court finds in Mr Odey's favour at the liability stage of the Libel Claim. However, I am not persuaded that there is a clear benefit to directing that general damages, causation or injunctive relief should also be decided at the subsequent stage. I turn to the specific factors.
- Heading
- WARNING: reporting restrictions may apply to the contents transcribed in this document, particularly if the case concerned a sexual offence or involved a child. Reporting restrictions prohibit the pub
- THE LIBEL CLAIM
- THE PI CLAIMS
- THE OVERLAP
- THE EVIDENCE BEFORE ME
- MATTERS RAISED AT THE OUTSET OF THE HEARING
- THE PARTIES' POSITION IN SUMMARY
- THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK
- Stay of proceedings
- Split Trials
- Limitation
- THE PARTIES’ SUBMISSIONS
- The PI claimants
- Mr Odey
- CONCLUSIONS - THE STAY APPLICATION AND THE JOINT TRIAL PROPOSAL
- CONCLUSIONS - THE SPLIT TRIAL APPLICATION
- Whether the prospective advantage of saving the costs of an investigation if liability is not established outweighs the likelihood of increased aggregate cost if liability is established and a further
- What are likely to be the advantages and disadvantages in terms of trial preparation and management
- Would a split trial impose unnecessary inconvenience or strain on witnesses who may be required in both trials
- Would a single trial to deal with both liability and quantum lead to excessive complexity and diffusion of issues, or place an undue burden on the judge hearing the case
- Would a split trial cause prejudice to one or other party
- Are there difficulties in defining an appropriate split, or is a clean split possible
- What weight is to be attached to the risk of duplication, delay and the disadvantages of the bifurcated appellate process
- Generally, what is perceived to offer the best course to ensure that the whole matter is adjudicated as fairly, quickly and effectively as possible
- CONCLUSIONS - SCOPE OF THE JOINT TRIAL
- The PI Claims
- Conclusions
![[2025] EWHC 2621 (KB)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AJKZXmE.png)