QB-2018-004997 - [2025] EWHC 2301 (KB)
Fecha: 09-Sep-2025
“Dishonesty”
“Dishonesty”
The test for dishonesty at common law is that set out by the Supreme Court in Ivey v Genting Casinos Limited [2018] A.C. 391 at paragraph 74:
“When dishonesty is in question the fact-finding tribunal must first ascertain (subjectively) the actual state of the individual’s knowledge or belief as to the facts. The reasonableness or otherwise of his belief is a matter of evidence (often in practice determinative) going to whether he held the belief, but it is not an additional requirement that his belief must be reasonable; the question is whether it is genuinely held. When once his actual state of mind as to knowledge or belief as to facts is established, the question whether his conduct was honest or dishonest is to be determined by the fact-finder by applying the (objective) standards of ordinary decent people. There is no requirement that the defendant must appreciate that what he has done is, by those standards, dishonest.”
- Heading
- Christopher Kennedy KC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge)
- Liability
- The circumstances of the accident
- Breach of duty
- The Animals Act 1971
- Fundamental dishonesty
- The evidence relating to the allegations of fundamental dishonesty
- Responsibility for the horses
- Evidence relating to the Claimant’s car
- Other material inconsistencies
- CPR 44.16
- “Dishonesty”
- “Fundamental Dishonesty”
- The cases advanced by the parties
- Findings on fundamental dishonesty
- The video surveillance
- Horses
- The car
- Conclusions