![HT-2022-000092 - [2024] EWHC 3184 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_yJUntHA.png){kind=logo}
Answers to issues
Answers to issues
For the reasons given above, it is probably sufficient to say that this claim fails as a matter of causation. However, for the sake of completeness, I answer the issues put before me below:
What were the terms of the contracts between Darcliffe and Glanville?
Glanville were obliged to carry out a Phase 1 Geo-Environmental Survey.
- Heading
- Adrian Williamson KC
- Glanville’s obligations (Issues 1 and 2)
- Glanville’s performance and alleged breach/negligence (Issue 4)
- Reliance/causation (Issues 3 and 5)
- Losses (Issues 6, 21 and 22)
- Miscellaneous (Issues 7, 8, and 18)
- Answers to issues
- What duties were owed by Glanville to Darcliffe when producing the report(s)?
- Have any of the alleged breaches of duty by Glanville caused Darcliffe a loss?
- What is the appropriate measure of loss in respect of each Defendant?
- Conclusions