![HT-2022-000092 - [2024] EWHC 3184 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_yJUntHA.png){kind=logo}
What duties were owed by Glanville to Darcliffe when producing the report(s)?
What duties were owed by Glanville to Darcliffe when producing the report(s)?
Glanville owed Darcliffe a duty to produce their reports with reasonable skill and care.
Did Darcliffe rely upon the report(s) produced by Glanville when purchasing the Land? If so, was such reliance reasonable and/or reasonably foreseeable?
No.
Did Glanville fail to exercise the degree of reasonable skill and care to be expected of a reasonably competent engineer producing a Phase 1 report(s), when it produced the report(s), in any of the respects set out in paragraph 64 of the Particulars of Claim?
Yes.
- Heading
- Adrian Williamson KC
- Glanville’s obligations (Issues 1 and 2)
- Glanville’s performance and alleged breach/negligence (Issue 4)
- Reliance/causation (Issues 3 and 5)
- Losses (Issues 6, 21 and 22)
- Miscellaneous (Issues 7, 8, and 18)
- Answers to issues
- What duties were owed by Glanville to Darcliffe when producing the report(s)?
- Have any of the alleged breaches of duty by Glanville caused Darcliffe a loss?
- What is the appropriate measure of loss in respect of each Defendant?
- Conclusions