![HT-2022-000417 - [2025] EWHC 1691 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_yJUntHA.png){kind=logo}
WAS THE DEFENDANT IN BREACH OF DUTY IN FAILING TO COMPLY WITH CLAUSE 6.13A OF THE BUILDING CONTRACT AS TO NOTIFICATION TO ITS INSURER(S) IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT OF THE CLAIMS ON 15 JANUARY 2019 OR TH
WAS THE DEFENDANT IN BREACH OF DUTY IN FAILING TO COMPLY WITH CLAUSE 6.13A OF THE BUILDING CONTRACT AS TO NOTIFICATION TO ITS INSURER(S) IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT OF THE CLAIMS ON 15 JANUARY 2019 OR THEREAFTER”
On the 24 June 2019 Simply made what I regard as an admission that it had not notified its insurer(s) when they informed the Claimants
“as we feel no need.”
What loss flows from this breach is not a question I have been asked to answer.
- Heading
- This judgment was handed down by the court remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and released to The National Archives. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be 4 Jul
- THE CLAIMS
- H WAS THE DEFENDANT IN BREACH OF DUTY IN FAILING TO COMPLY WITH CLAUSE 6.13A OF THE BUILDING CONTRACT AS TO NOTIFICATION TO ITS INSURER(S) IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT OF THE CLAIMS ON 15 JANUARY 2019 OR
- INTRODUCTION
- LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
- THE REMAINING ISSUES
- Liability Issue
- WITNESSES
- FACTUAL HISTORY
- Findings of Fact
- THE EXPERT EVIDENCE
- THE CLAIMS
- Alternative 2
- WAS THE DEFENDANT IN BREACH OF DUTY IN FAILING TO COMPLY WITH CLAUSE 6.13A OF THE BUILDING CONTRACT AS TO NOTIFICATION TO ITS INSURER(S) IMMEDIATELY UPON RECEIPT OF THE CLAIMS ON 15 JANUARY 2019 OR TH
- INTEREST
- Conclusions