Conclusions
Disposal of the appeal
The FtT’s decision involved an error on a point of law. I set aside its decision. The appeal against the local authority’s decision to cease to maintain an EHC Plan is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for re-determination.
Directions
I direct as follows:
The appeal against the local authority’s decision to cease to maintain EM’s EHC Plan is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for re-determination;
The First-tier Tribunal is to hold a hearing before re-determining the appeal;
The panel hearing the remitted appeal is to be wholly different from the panel that previously heard this matter;
The case file is to be placed before the Deputy President of, or a salaried judge assigned to, the Health, Education and Social Care Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal to consider whether any further case management directions are required.
Upper Tribunal Judge Price
28/5/2024
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal
- Reasons for decision
- Summary
- The relevant legal framework
- Prior to the FtT appeal
- The FtT appeal
- EM has an educational need for OT as special educational provision, and this cannot be delivered without an EHCP
- The reality is that EM will not benefit from further special educational provision
- The FtT conclusions
- Permission to appeal
- Conclusions
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 317 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)