Summary
Summary
This case concerns a local authority’s decision to cease to maintain an EHC Plan for a disabled young person. The authority’s decision was upheld by the FtT. The appeal against the FtT’s decision succeeds. The FtT’s approach to the question of whether on-going social or health care would deliver the special educational provision required by the young person, involved an error on a point of law.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal
- Reasons for decision
- Summary
- The relevant legal framework
- Prior to the FtT appeal
- The FtT appeal
- EM has an educational need for OT as special educational provision, and this cannot be delivered without an EHCP
- The reality is that EM will not benefit from further special educational provision
- The FtT conclusions
- Permission to appeal
- Conclusions
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 317 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png)