![[2024] UKUT 258 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to ALLOW the appeal. The Respondent made mistakes in findings of fact it made and on which its decision of 22 August 2022 (reference DBS6191 00960513296 ) to incl
The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to ALLOW the appeal. The Respondent made mistakes in findings of fact it made and on which its decision of 22 August 2022 (reference DBS6191 00960513296) to include AW in the children’s and adults’ barred lists was based. The Upper Tribunal directs the Respondent to remove AW from both barred lists.
REASONS FOR DECISION
This appeal
This is an appeal against the decision (“DBS’s decision”) of the Respondent (“DBS”) dated 22 August 2022to include AW in the children’s and adults’ barred lists.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to ALLOW the appeal. The Respondent made mistakes in findings of fact it made and on which its decision of 22 August 2022 (reference DBS6191 00960513296 ) to incl
- DBS’s decision
- Jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal
- The grant of permission to appeal
- Documentary evidence in the bundle
- Background facts
- Review of the key evidence
- TH
- JB
- Night of 16-17 March 2021: general
- Night of 16-17 March 2021: JB
- Night of 16-17 March 2021: TH
- Aspects of AW’s evidence emphasised in cross examination
- Other evidence
- Documents recording PK’s views shortly after the night of 16-17 March 2021
- Documents recording IG’s and ER’s views shortly after the night of 16-17 March 2021
- Documents recording GB’s views shortly after the night of 16-17 March 2021
- The “significant discussion” with AW and employer on 8 December 2020 - the record keeping issue
- Points emphasised by DBS’s counsel on the evidence
- Our factual findings
- TH
- Our conclusions as to mistakes of fact in DBS’s decision
- Conclusions