[2025] UKUT 069 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2025] UKUT 069 (AAC)

Fecha: 20-Ene-2025

Documentary evidence in the Upper Tribunal bundle

Documentary evidence in the Upper Tribunal bundle

10.

In addition to DBS’s decision letter, evidence in the bundle of 370 pages included:

a.

two 2-page police case summaries; these present the following:

i.

the 14 year old girl was interviewed by the police on 2 May 2001; during this, she “disclosed offences against” DGW;

ii.

the 14 year old girl had been introduced to DGW about two months before, by another resident at the residential care unit where they lived; during this time, DGW had contact with the 14 year old girl on most days; he would either telephone her at the unit or sit in his car outside;

iii.

shortly after they met, DGW and the 14 year old girl spent the evening, night and following morning at the home of a friend of DGW’s; they had sex three times;

iv.

staff at the residential care unit became concerned for the 14 year old girl’s welfare and safety whilst with DGW; they kept a log of DGW’s daily visits to the unit and his contact with the 14 year old girl, including his taking her from the unit in his car;

v.

DGW knew the 14 year old girl’s age;

vi.

the 14 year old girl said she had stayed overnight at DGW’s home; she was seen on occasions by police in DGW’s flat;

vii.

on 7 March 2001 the 14 year old girl was “recovered” on two occasions from DGW’s home by police; on one of these occasions, she was “worse for wear” through alcohol consumption; the 14 year old girl said she had been given alcohol by DGW, in the company of other “young females”;

viii.

on 9 April 2001, staff from the residential care unit told DGW the 14 year old girl’s age and said she did not have permission to go out with him; but DGW continued his contact with the 14 year old girl;

ix.

on 17 April 2001 the police child protection team informed DGW by letter that they had concerns regarding his relationship with the 14 year old girl and one other; he was asked to discontinue his associations with the children because of their ages and the fact they were spending significant periods of time away from their carers; DGW appeared to ignore this advice; he continued to visit the unit and the 14 year old girl;

x.

on 10 May 2001 DGW was arrested on suspicion of child abduction and other offences involving the 14 year old girl; in his interview that day, DGW accepted that he had visited the residential care unit on many occasions and spent time with the 14 year old girl; he accepted that he took her away in his car on numerous occasions; he said he was continuing the contact because the 14 year old girl was threatening to harm herself; he denied committing any offences against the 14 year old girl; DGW was subsequently charged with child abduction and released on bail (with conditions); DGW was again interviewed by the police on 14 August 2001;

b.

a 60 page transcript of the police interview with the 14 year old girl, in May 2001;

c.

a 7 page note of the police interview with the 14 year old girl, in March 2001;

d.

a 56 page transcript of the police interview with DGW, in May 2001;

e.

a 21 page transcript of police interview with DGW, in August 2001;

f.

police witness statements of several people employed by the local city council, social services department, concerning the young people’s residential unit where the 14 year old girl lived and DGW’s interactions with it in 2001 (and a log kept by the unit in that regard);

g.

police witness statements of police officers involved in the case;

h.

police witness statements from May and November 2001 of someone who knew DGW through her boyfriend at the time; she described herself as being best mates with DGW at the time; this described interactions between DGW and the 14 year old girl, at the time;

i.

police witness statement of DGW’s then-girlfriend, from May 2001;

j.

DBS’s barring decision summary document; and

k.

an email from DGW to the Upper Tribunal of 6 June 2024, setting out his case.