![[2025] UKUT 153 (AAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_3a2BKne.png){kind=logo}
The parties’ submissions before me
The parties’ submissions before me
As there was agreement between the parties as to the mobility component and Activity 9, I set out only the arguments on the main issue, Activity 4, referencing Activity 9 only where the interaction between the two activities was considered as part of the arguments in relation to an error of law in evaluation of the evidence overall.
- Heading
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to allow the appeal and remake the decision
- Factual background
- Legal framework
- “aided” means with
- “bathe” includes get into or out of an unadapted bath or shower
- Schedule 1 activities as relevant before the Upper Tribunal Daily Living
- “Assessing whether you were able to wash and bathe to an acceptable standard, including other point-scoring descriptors within this activity: The tribunal decided you scored descriptor 4.a (0 points)
- Daily living
- Mobility
- The parties’ submissions before me
- The appellant
- The respondent
- Analysis
- What is Activity 4 assessing?
- Applying this within the descriptors
- My conclusions as to Activity 4
- Soap as an aid?
- omitted
- Conclusions