[2025] UKUT 299 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

[2025] UKUT 299 (AAC)

Fecha: 17-Abr-2025

Introduction

Introduction

1.

These appeals involve a common legal issue. They were therefore heard and determined together. The SSWP’s appeal against the First-tier Tribunal decision made about SC was registered first with the Upper Tribunal office. It therefore appears as the first named appeal.

2.

The structure of these decisions is as follows:

Table of Contents

Introduction 4

Factual background and the First-tier Tribunals’ decisions 5

(a) SSWP v SC 5

(b) MJ v (1) LB Bromley and (2) SSWP 6

Hearing before the Upper Tribunal 9

Legal framework 11

Summary of the legal issues and some terms used by the parties 12

The parties’ positions and the arguments put forward at the hearing 13

CPAG’s arguments on behalf of MJ and observations about SC 13

(b) The SSWP’s arguments in relation to both appeals 19

(c) LP’s arguments in relation to the appeal against SC 24

Legal analysis 26

(a) Case law dealing with closed period supersessions decided before the Social Security Act 1998 26

(b) Case law about closed period supersessions made under the Social Security Act 1998 29

(c) Published DWP guidance about the application of closed period supersession decisions 32

(d) Comparing the different legislation addressed by the case law 33

(e) The role of section 8 of the SS Act 1998 in closed period supersessions 37

(f) The legal mechanism for making a closed period supersession 38

(g) Addressing the supersession mechanism put forward by Mr Williams 41

(h) Application of the anticipated change of circumstances supersession ground to MJ or SC 44

(i) Could a prospective closed period supersession decision be made about SC or MJ to preserve their benefit award? 45

(j) Delaying the supersession decision until each claimant returned to Great Britain (the abuse of power argument) 46

(k) The argument that DWP should only have removed SC’s UC entitlement once she exceeded the one-month absence allowed under regulation 11 of the UC regulations 2013 49

(l) Was it open to FTT1 to revise the SSWP’s decision about SC and make a nil award of UC? 50

Conclusions 51

Disposal 53

SC’s appeal 53

(b) MJ’s appeal 54

Annex A: relevant applicable legislation 55

Universal Credit 55

Housing Benefit 58

Benefit claims, entitlement and adjudication 60