Juristeca
Juristeca País
    [2025] UKUT 167 (AAC)
    Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber

    [2025] UKUT 167 (AAC)

    Fecha: 09-May-2025

    The Appellant’s evidence

    The Appellant’s evidence

    35.

    There are three main sources of evidence from the Appellant. These are the record of his police interview (pp.37-77), his written representations to the DBS (pp.127-129) and his oral evidence at the hearing before us together with his witness statement. We deal with the main features of each source in turn.

    • Heading
    • The decision of the Upper Tribunal is to dismiss the appeal. The decision of the Disclosure and Barring Service dated 8 April 2024 was not based on any material mistake in any finding of fact and invo
    • Introduction
    • The individuals involved
    • A summary of the factual background
    • The Upper Tribunal oral hearing
    • The legal framework for barring decisions
    • The Disclosure and Barring Service’s decision to bar the Appellant
    • The Appellant’s grounds of appeal
    • The Appellant’s oral evidence
    • Ground 1
    • Ellie’s evidence
    • Mollie’s evidence
    • The Appellant’s evidence
    • The police interview
    • The Appellant’s written representations to the DBS
    • The Appellant’s oral evidence to the Upper Tribunal
    • Mistake of fact: our analysis
    • Ground 2
    • The parties’ submissions
    • Proportionality: our analysis
    • Conclusions

    Otros enlaces de interés:

    Jurisprudencia clasificada por bienes e inmuebles Jurisprudencia clasificada por contravención de las normas jurídicas Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos de la unión europea Jurisprudencia clasificada por derechos fundamentales Jurisprudencia clasificada por materias del derecho Jurisprudencia clasificada por profesiones Jurisprudencia clasificada por sector agrario Jurisprudencia clasificada por sectores de la sociedad

    Síguenos en

    Políticas de eliminación | Políticas de privacidad

    © 2026 Juristeca