Conclusions in this appeal
50. We have found that the claimant’s marriage to Mr Awuah was and remains valid according to Dutch law. We have found that Mr Awuah was free to marry the claimant. As she was and remains the spouse of an EEA national, she is therefore a family member of an EEA national who has been at all material times a qualified person, and thus, she was and is entitled to the issuance of a residence card under Regulation 17(1) of the Regulations.
- Kareem
- Ghana
- History of directions issued by the Upper Tribunal
- The hearing before us
- Kareem
- Kareem (proxy marriages – EU law)
- must always
- Our findings
- SI (expert evidence - Kurd - SM confirmed) Iraq CG
- Conclusions in this appeal
- We re-make the decision by allowing the appeal under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006.
- Upper Tribunal
- UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RINTOUL
- Between
- SHIRLEY NANA AMA CUDJOE
- Representation
- [2014] UKUT 00024
- Berthiaume – v- Dastous
- Padolecchia –v-Padolecchia
- Lawrence v Lawrence
- TA and Others
- Directions