must always
be examined in accordance with the laws of the Member State from which the Union citizen obtains nationality.” 16. At paragraph [20] of TA, Upper Tribunal Judge O’Connor held: “Given that which I set out above, it is difficult to see how the Upper Tribunal in Kareem could have been any clearer in its conclusion that when consideration is being given to whether an applicant has undertaken a valid marriage for the purposes of the 2006 Regulations, such consideration has to be assessed by reference to the laws of the legal system of the nationality of the relevant Union citizen. Mr Akohene’s submissions to the contrary are entirely misconceived and are born out of a failure to read the determination in Kareem as a whole.”
- Kareem
- Ghana
- History of directions issued by the Upper Tribunal
- The hearing before us
- Kareem
- Kareem (proxy marriages – EU law)
- must always
- Our findings
- SI (expert evidence - Kurd - SM confirmed) Iraq CG
- Conclusions in this appeal
- We re-make the decision by allowing the appeal under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006.
- Upper Tribunal
- UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RINTOUL
- Between
- SHIRLEY NANA AMA CUDJOE
- Representation
- [2014] UKUT 00024
- Berthiaume – v- Dastous
- Padolecchia –v-Padolecchia
- Lawrence v Lawrence
- TA and Others
- Directions
