Nixon
(permission to appeal: grounds) [2014] UKUT 368 (IAC) follows inexorably. It should never be necessary for the Upper Tribunal to invest its limited resources in protracted attempts to construe applications for permission to appeal or grants of permission to appeal. This is manifestly inimical to the overriding objective. Applications for permission to appeal should be crisp, succinct and clear. The application in the present case takes the form of a diffuse and unparticularised essay. Having conducted this unwelcome exercise, I conclude that the scope of this appeal is confined to the two issues set forth in [11] above.
- Introduction
- The EEA Regulations
- Regulation 19(1B):
- Regulation 19(3):
- Regulation 21:
- The British Nationality Act 1981
- The Secretary of State’s Decision
- Decision of the First-Tier Tribunal
- therefore
- Permission to Appeal
- MG and VC
- LG (Italy) v SSHD
- Nixon
- The British Citizenship Issue
- by virtue of Home Office policy
- lawful
- policy
- Decision