Anonymity
(1)The Appellant continues to benefit from the protection of anonymity. Accordingly, nothing will be published or communicated which identifies or could have the effect of identifying him. Any infringement of this prohibition could result in, inter alia, contempt proceedings.
- Anonymity
- Introduction
- R (Gazi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (ETS – Judicial Review)
- SM and Qadir v SSHD (ETS – Evidence – Burden of Proof)
- speaking
- SM and Qadir
- The Issues
- The Expert Evidence
- could
- uploading
- The Appellant’s Case
- several
- to where
- anything
- The Main Factual Issues: Findings And Conclusions
- general
- specific
- Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shehzad and Chowdhury
- apparently
- other
- Decision and Disposal
- Date:
- Ruling No 1
- APPENDIX 2. Ruling No 2
- Harris
- APPENDIX 3. Ruling No 3