speaking
and 190 out of 200 for that of writing. The spotlight in this appeal is firmly, though not exclusively, on the speaking score which he claims to have obtained.
- Anonymity
- Introduction
- R (Gazi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (ETS – Judicial Review)
- SM and Qadir v SSHD (ETS – Evidence – Burden of Proof)
- speaking
- SM and Qadir
- The Issues
- The Expert Evidence
- could
- uploading
- The Appellant’s Case
- several
- to where
- anything
- The Main Factual Issues: Findings And Conclusions
- general
- specific
- Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shehzad and Chowdhury
- apparently
- other
- Decision and Disposal
- Date:
- Ruling No 1
- APPENDIX 2. Ruling No 2
- Harris
- APPENDIX 3. Ruling No 3