both
the withdrawal of an appellant’s appeal and the withdrawal of the Secretary of State’s case or appeal is required.
(iii)
Every judicial determination of an appellant’s proposal to withdraw an appeal or the Secretary of State’s proposal to withdraw requires a brief outline of the reasons for the decision. The purpose of the judicial scrutiny is to ensure that the appeal is being properly and correctly withdrawn. (iv)
Judicial scrutiny will normally result in the mooted withdrawal of the appeal being perfected by transmission of the notice to the parties required by Rule 17(iii). However, this will not occur automatically:
- Introduction
- The FtT Hearing
- Appeal to this Tribunal
- Rule 2
- Rule 4
- Rule 5
- Rule 17
- Rule 29
- appellant
- The Core Duties
- client
- conducting
- clients
- both
- for example
- proposed
- appeal
- substantive
- MK (Duty to Give Reasons) Pakistan
- Direction Regarding Anonymity – Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008