Rule 17
(iii). However, this will not occur automatically: for example where the proposed withdrawal lacks coherence or is based on a clear material misunderstanding or misconception. (v)
The outcome of the judicial scrutiny should be briefly reasoned. (vi)
- Introduction
- The FtT Hearing
- Appeal to this Tribunal
- Rule 2
- Rule 4
- Rule 5
- Rule 17
- Rule 29
- appellant
- The Core Duties
- client
- conducting
- clients
- both
- for example
- proposed
- appeal
- substantive
- MK (Duty to Give Reasons) Pakistan
- Direction Regarding Anonymity – Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008