Ground 4
: the decision is irrational, in that the respondent took into account irrelevant matters and/or failed to take into account relevant matters. 18. Judge Jackson refused permission in relation to the following two grounds. The applicant has applied to renew his application for permission to bring judicial review proceedings on these grounds orally: a.
- JUDGMENT
- MS (India) and MT (Tunisia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- MS (India)
- Ground 4
- Ground 2
- Ground 3
- Ground 5
- Ground 6
- Ground 7 (original ground 1)
- Ground 8 (original ground 2)
- Ground 9 (original ground 3)
- Ground 10 (original ground 4)
- RELEVANT LAW AND POLICY
- refoulement
- Agyarko
- DISCUSSION
- Current barriers to removal
- Duration of leave
- Pretty v United Kingdom
- expulsion or other measures
- Bensaid v United Kingdom
- MS (India) and MT (Tunisia)
- Jeunesse
- Kardi v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Kardi
- Babar
- Razgar
- Limited leave to remain on the grounds of private life in the UK may be granted for a period not exceeding 30 months
- Ruhumuliza v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- KO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- KO (Nigeria)
- due regard has been given to the medical evidence that your client has provided in support his claim that the duration of leave granted may have a future adverse effect on his mental health
- GROUNDS 8 AND 9 – EQUALITY ACT 2010
- S and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- CONCLUSION