R (AT) v SSHD
[2017] EWHC 2589 (Admin); [2018] Imm AR 483) that the respondent’s decision amounted to the refusal of a human rights claim and that a right of appeal accordingly arose under Part 5 of the 2002 Act. 111. Lane J reviewed his own decision in
- J U D G M E N T
- Judge Blundell:
- Factual Background
- Application for Fee Waiver
- Decision Under Challenge
- R (Carter) v SSHD
- Procedural Background
- R (Omar) v SSHD
- Ahsan
- Legislative Scheme
- Omar
- Sheikh
- It seems to me that if a person demonstrates upon proper proof that they cannot pay the fee, then a policy which does not provide for waiver in those circumstances is incompatible with a Convention right. [emphasis added]
- Version 3.0 of the Fee Waiver Policy
- Carter
- Although a fee waiver will not normally be granted where evidence of destitution is not provided, or where an applicant cannot show that they would be rendered destitute by paying the fee, there may be exceptional circumstances affecting the applicant’s expenditure which mean that a fee waiver should be granted.
- It is for the applicant to provide evidence that there is something exceptional about their financial circumstances and ability to pay that warrant granting the fee waiver request
- Witness Evidence for the Respondent
- Submissions
- Ahsan v SSHD
- Shrestha
- Balajigari
- R (Mujahid) v FtT & SSHD
- Shrestha
- Discussion
- R (Ellis) v SSHD
- MS & MBT v SSHD
- PK (Ghana) v SSHD
- Odelola
- Sherstha
- Ahsan & Others v SSHD
- Ahsan & Ors
- Ahsan
- Balajigari & Ors
- R (AT) v SSHD
- Baihinga
- R (Alighanbari) v SSHD
- [2013] EWHC 1818 (Admin)
- SSHD v JCWI
- Supplemental Judgment
- Postscript