Discussion
27. In Mahad v Entry Clearance Officer [2009] UKSC 16 Lord Brown stated, at [10]: There is really no dispute about the proper approach to the construction of the Rules. As Lord Hoffmann said in
- J U D G M E N T
- Background
- The decisions under challenge
- Relevant legislative framework
- my emphasis
- and the applicant must not be eligible to apply for leave to remain as a partner under this Appendix
- (iii) the applicant must not be eligible to apply for leave to remain as a partner under this Appendix
- The applicant’s submissions
- Mahad
- Pokhriyal v SSHD
- The respondent’s submissions
- Discussion
- Pokhriyal