Pokhriyal v SSHD
[2013] EWCA Civ 1568, at [39] - [42]. 21. The applicant finally rejects the respondent’s contention that his interpretation would enable individuals to choose whether to apply under the parent or partner route which would, according to the respondent, compromise the financial requirements for applicants under the partner route and which would enable them to avoid those requirements by applying under the parent route.
- J U D G M E N T
- Background
- The decisions under challenge
- Relevant legislative framework
- my emphasis
- and the applicant must not be eligible to apply for leave to remain as a partner under this Appendix
- (iii) the applicant must not be eligible to apply for leave to remain as a partner under this Appendix
- The applicant’s submissions
- Mahad
- Pokhriyal v SSHD
- The respondent’s submissions
- Discussion
- Pokhriyal