Judge Canavan:
1. This judgment considers the respondent’s power to revoke Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) under section 76(2)(a) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (as amended) (NIAA 2002) and the associated policy guidance, Revocation of Indefinite Leave (Version 4.0) (19 October 2015), in the case of a person who was granted ILR under the Legacy Programme i.e. under an operational programme. 2. The applicant seeks to challenge the respondent’s decision dated 15 August 2019 to revoke ILR granted on 12 August 2010. 3. Due to the continued need to take precautions to prevent the spread of Covid 19 the hearing took place in a court room at Field House with counsel appearing by video conference and with the facility for others to attend remotely. We were satisfied that this was consistent with the open justice principle, that the parties could make their submissions clearly, and that the case could be heard fairly by this mode of hearing.
- ____________________________
- Judge Canavan:
- Background
- Hakemi and Others
- but this list is not exhaustive.
- as a whole
- including character, conduct and employment record)
- Revocation of leave to enter or remain
- Deception Cases
- Passage of time
- Genuine Mistakes/Errors
- Previously Overlooked or Considered
- Compelling and Compassionate Circumstances
- ‘6.2.2
- The issues
- Decision and reasons