“34. — Decision with or without a hearing
(1) Subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the Upper Tribunal may make any decision without a hearing. (2) The Upper Tribunal must have regard to any view expressed by a party when deciding whether to hold a hearing to consider any matter, and the form of any such hearing.” 10. The material part of the Guidance Note, paragraphs 9 to 17, said this (footnotes omitted): “
- Introduction
- Relevant Provisions
- “34. — Decision with or without a hearing
- Making Certain Appeal Decisions Without A Hearing
- The Tribunal’s power to set aside its own decisions
- Rule 34 Decisions and rule 43 “procedural irregularity”
- The Secretary of State’s submission
- The significance of the Guidance Note, per se
- The significance of reference (or lack of reference) to the Guidance Note or other matters.
- The significance of directions given by the Tribunal: pre-judgment of the rule 34 decision.
- in electronic form
- who considers that despite the forgoing directions a hearing is necessary
- The directions in paragraph 2 above must be complied with in every case.
- Consent; failure to comply with the direction permitting submission in opposition to the provisional view.
- Appearance of bias
- Final observations on generic matters
- Applying the rule 43(3) time limit; applications for an extension of time
- (HU/18412/2019)
- (PA/09206/2019)
- (PA/4768/2019)
- (HU/8693/2017)
- TO & BO (Nigeria)
- (HU/04826/2019 & HU/04831/2019)
- (HU/4735/2019)
- (10)
- (11)
- (12)
- (13)
- (14)
- (15)
- (HU/13731/2019)
- (17)
- (18)
- (PA/05994/2019)
- Disposal
- Mr Justice Swift