Disposal
154. For the reasons above the rule 43 applications in Mohammed Chowdhury (HU/11561/2019), and RSS (Iraq) (PA/11981/2019) are granted. In these cases, the error of law decisions of the Tribunal are set aside, and the error of law appeals will need to be reheard. The remaining rule 43 applications are refused. 155. In the cases in which applications for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal remain pending, separate decisions will be issued on those applications in due course.
- Introduction
- Relevant Provisions
- “34. — Decision with or without a hearing
- Making Certain Appeal Decisions Without A Hearing
- The Tribunal’s power to set aside its own decisions
- Rule 34 Decisions and rule 43 “procedural irregularity”
- The Secretary of State’s submission
- The significance of the Guidance Note, per se
- The significance of reference (or lack of reference) to the Guidance Note or other matters.
- The significance of directions given by the Tribunal: pre-judgment of the rule 34 decision.
- in electronic form
- who considers that despite the forgoing directions a hearing is necessary
- The directions in paragraph 2 above must be complied with in every case.
- Consent; failure to comply with the direction permitting submission in opposition to the provisional view.
- Appearance of bias
- Final observations on generic matters
- Applying the rule 43(3) time limit; applications for an extension of time
- (HU/18412/2019)
- (PA/09206/2019)
- (PA/4768/2019)
- (HU/8693/2017)
- TO & BO (Nigeria)
- (HU/04826/2019 & HU/04831/2019)
- (HU/4735/2019)
- (10)
- (11)
- (12)
- (13)
- (14)
- (15)
- (HU/13731/2019)
- (17)
- (18)
- (PA/05994/2019)
- Disposal
- Mr Justice Swift