Relevant procedural history
Relevant procedural history
The applicant applied for permission to apply for judicial review on 15 September 2023. Expedition was granted and time was extended on the same date. Upper Tribunal Judge Norton-Taylor granted permission on 16 October 2023. The respondent raised the issue of jurisdiction in the summary grounds of defence (SGD). Judge Norton-Taylor was of the view that there was no challenge to the Immigration Rules or legislation and therefore the Upper Tribunal had jurisdiction. The respondent did not rely on this issue in his skeleton argument or at the hearing before me.
- Heading
- Order regarding anonymity Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appl
- Judge Frances
- Decision under challenge
- Grounds
- Agreed facts
- Relevant procedural history
- Chapter III ECAT
- Relevant authority
- Nationality and Borders Act 2022 (NABA)
- Immigration Rules
- Policy Guidance
- DLP
- VTSP
- Conclusions on the interpretation of policy
- Does the DLP intend to give effect to Article 14(1)(a) ECAT ?
- Does the DLP give effect to Article 14(1)(a)?
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 00067 (IAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AioYBzS.png)