Conclusions
Summary of Decision
In summary, the Applicant succeeds on grounds (1) and (2). The Applicant also succeeds on ground (3) insofar that the decisions were procedurally unfair and in part, perverse.
I have invited the parties to draw up the appropriate orders.
~~~~0~~~~
- Heading
- Where a rule permits, but does not require, consideration of certain matters, as in R (Khatun) and others v London Borough of Newham [2004] EWCA Civ 55 , a useful related assessment is that proposed b
- Judge Keith
- Background
- The decision under challenge
- The application for administrative review
- The administrative review challenge
- The Applicant’s grounds of challenge and the Response
- Ground 1
- The Respondent’s case
- Ground 2
- The Respondent’s case
- Ground 3
- The Respondent’s case
- Materiality of any public law error
- The Respondent’s case
- The Law
- Relevant statutory provisions
- Conclusions - Grounds (1) and (2)
- Conclusions - Ground (3)
- Conclusions - materiality
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 00281 (IAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AioYBzS.png)