![[2024] UKUT 00281 (IAC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_AioYBzS.png){kind=logo}
Judge Keith
Judge Keith:
The parties provided a paginated composite bundle of documents. I refer to pages as ‘page [x]/CB’ for the remainder of these reasons. They also provided a paginated authorities bundle, to which I will refer as ‘page [x]/AB’, and skeleton arguments, which I do not recite, but have considered in full. I refer to the parties’ cases and submissions only where necessary to explain my decision.
- Heading
- Where a rule permits, but does not require, consideration of certain matters, as in R (Khatun) and others v London Borough of Newham [2004] EWCA Civ 55 , a useful related assessment is that proposed b
- Judge Keith
- Background
- The decision under challenge
- The application for administrative review
- The administrative review challenge
- The Applicant’s grounds of challenge and the Response
- Ground 1
- The Respondent’s case
- Ground 2
- The Respondent’s case
- Ground 3
- The Respondent’s case
- Materiality of any public law error
- The Respondent’s case
- The Law
- Relevant statutory provisions
- Conclusions - Grounds (1) and (2)
- Conclusions - Ground (3)
- Conclusions - materiality
- Conclusions