[2025] UKUT 00154 (IAC)
Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber

[2025] UKUT 00154 (IAC)

Fecha: 09-Abr-2025

Conclusions

C. Disposal

41.

The first consequence of the above is that the Applicant’s application for costs is refused. The further consequence is that the Home Secretary’s counter-application for costs is granted, albeit that since the Applicant is in receipt of public funding the usual restriction on the ability to enforce that order will apply.

42.

We would be grateful if counsel could seek to agree the terms of an order reflecting the conclusions we have reached. That order should also include all other matters necessary to bring the Applicant’s claim to an end.

~~~~0~~~~