Heading

Case No: LC-2023-164
A NOTICE OF REFERENCE UNDER SCHEDULE 3A TO THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT 2003
Royal Courts of Justice
23 February 2024
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS CODE – CODE RIGHTS – whether the agreement was a Code agreement – what is electronic communications apparatus – building whose “sole purpose” is to enclose electronic communications apparatus – validity of a notice under paragraph 31 of the Code – whether separate contractual notice required
BETWEEN:
ON TOWER UK LIMITED
Claimant
-and-
BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC
Respondent
Kenton Road Telephone Exchange,
Kenton Park Parade,
South Kenton,
Harrow,
Middlesex, HA3 8DH
Upper Tribunal Judge Elizabeth Cooke and Mr Peter D McCrea FRICS FCIArb
9 and 10 January 2024
Mr Kester Lees for the claimant, instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP
Ms Stephanie Tozer KC and Ms Tricia Hemans for the respondent, instructed by Addleshaw Goddard LLP
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
Biles v Caesar [1957] 1 WLR 156
Blunden v Frogmore Investments Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 573
Commercial Properties Ltd v Wood [1968] 1 QB 15
CTIL v Keast [2019] UKUT 116 (LC)
Inland Revenue Commissioners v Mills [1975] AC 38 (HL)
Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Services Securities Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72
O’May v City of London Real Property Co Ltd [1983] 2 AC 726
R v Spooner (ex p Arun DC) [2007] EWHC 307 (Admin)
Scholl Mfg Co Ltd v Clifton (Slim-Line) Ltd [1967] 1 Ch 41
Smyth-Britt v Chubb [2004] 2 WLUK 621
1.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Background (1): the Kenton Road Exchange, the Site and the parties’ titles
- Background (2): the early termination provisions in the OT Leases
- Background (3): the Code
- Background (4): the notices
- Issue 1: is the OT Lease a Code agreement?
- The consequences of the Tribunal’s decision on Issue 1
- Issue 3: is the paragraph 31 notice valid?
- Issue 3(1): the construction of paragraph 31(3)(b)
- Issue 3(2): was the paragraph 31 notice valid?
- A short excursion into issue 2: the validity of the break notice
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 51 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)