Introduction
Introduction
This is the Tribunal’s determination of preliminary issues in a reference under Schedule 3A to the Communications Act 2003, known as the Electronic Communications Code or simply “the Code”. The claimant, On Tower UK Ltd, has equipment on the roof of a telephone exchange belonging to the respondent, and the respondent, British Telecommunications plc, wants it removed; that apparently straightforward situation is complicated by the fact that both parties are “Code operators”, that is, organisations who have been designated by OFCOM as ones that may benefit from Code rights pursuant to section 106 of the 2003 Act.
The claimant was represented by Mr Kester Lees, and the respondent by Ms Stephanie Tozer KC and Ms Tricia Hemans; we are grateful to them all.
In the paragraphs that follow we set out the factual and legal background to the reference, and then we address the issues we are asked to decide.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Background (1): the Kenton Road Exchange, the Site and the parties’ titles
- Background (2): the early termination provisions in the OT Leases
- Background (3): the Code
- Background (4): the notices
- Issue 1: is the OT Lease a Code agreement?
- The consequences of the Tribunal’s decision on Issue 1
- Issue 3: is the paragraph 31 notice valid?
- Issue 3(1): the construction of paragraph 31(3)(b)
- Issue 3(2): was the paragraph 31 notice valid?
- A short excursion into issue 2: the validity of the break notice
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 51 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)