[2024] UKUT 112 (LC)

Case No: LC-2023-115

AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 84 OF THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925

8 May 2024

TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – MODIFICATION – consent covenant in favour of dissolved company – obsolescence – benefit of other covenants annexed to the company’s land - one house, one plot covenant - practical benefits of substantial advantage – scale, density, open aspect – application refused

BETWEEN:

COLIN BERNARD MEDLEY

Applicant

-and-

ROSS MACKENZIE (1)

YASHWANT AND SUSHMA KOAK (2)

GUNTER AND GLYNNE STOHR (3)

ASIM AND UZMA CHAUDHARY (4)

STELLA DIGGINS (5)

GLEN & CLAIRE FELDMAN (6)

LESLEY BELLAMY (7)

TAI WAI WONG (8)

RAJESH KHAKHAR AND CHRSTINE FUCHS-KHAKHAR (9)

PAUL VELLA AND CATHY O’ROUKE (10)

CATHERINE EILEEN BOAK (11)

MICHAEL ALPHONSO CHRISTIAN AND BRENDA PATRICIA

MARGARET REGAN (12)

MRS P M MORLEY (13)

ROBERT L AND KELLY R WALKER (14)

Objectors

12 High Elms,

Chigwell,

Essex, IG7 6NF

Upper Tribunal Judge Elizabeth Cooke and Mr Mark Higgin FRICS FIRRV

9-10 April 2024

Ms Robyn Cunningham for the applicant, instructed by Fahri LLP

Mr James Fuller for objectors 1 to 10, instructed on a direct access basis

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

The following cases are referred to in this decision:

Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister [2002] EWHC 2443

Federated Homes Limited v Mill Lodge Properties Limited (1980) 39 P & CR 576

Re Bass Ltd’s Application (1973) 26 P & CR 156

Ridley v Taylor [1965] 1 WLR 611

1.